SSG is reader-supported and we may earn an affiliate commission from Amazon purchases through our links

Shark Rotator LA702 vs. LA502

Updated: Mar 23, 2025

Rotator is the classic Shark's lineup produced for over 10 years. The LA702 and LA502 are the upgraded modifications of the classic Rotator. It has a new roller system which makes the overall experience much better.

Shark Rotator LA702 vs. LA502

Specs LA702 Rotator Pet Lift-Away LA502 Rotator
Price $249.99 $319.99
Specs
Dust capacity (quarts/ml) 0.8/757 0.89/842
Wattage 960 890
Cord length (ft) 30 30
Product weight (lbs/kg) 14.35/6.4 12.3/5.57
Cleaning mechanics
Anti-Allergen Complete Seal yes yes
Filter type HEPA + Foam Filters HEPA + Foam Filters
Brushroll technology DuoClean PowerFins HairPro DuoClean PowerFins
Self-Cleaning Brushroll yes yes
Powered Lift-Away yes yes
LED yes yes
Package
Crevice Tool yes yes
Dust Brush yes -
Upholstery Tool yes yes
Pet Power Brush - yes
Odor Neutralizer yes -

The Rotator LA702 is an upgraded modification of the LA502.

Both vacuums use a Dual roller system PowerFins known for its best pickup abilities on both surfaces. The PowerFins is used on the Shark's premium lineup.

The PowerFins HairPro does a better job at resisting hair tangles and is a newer Shark's technology.

Better than before

The LA702 has odor-neutralizer technology and better roller technology. It has more power but has a smaller dustbin and is heavier than the previous gen.

Editor's recomendation

The LA502 is a good buy when it's on sale or much cheaper than the LA702 since it lacks power and new technologies.

Also good

The Shark LA502 Rotator is a much better modification than the classic Rotator with its old-style brushroll that has to be cleaned after every cleaning.

The only thing the LA502 is better than the LA702 is the duct cup capacity.

The LA502 Rotator is a great upright, much better than the old version but when compared to the next-gen LA702 which has about the same price, we have no doubts which one is a better pick.


Comments: 0

Required for comment verification